Pole vaulting is a track and field event in which a person uses a long, flexible pole (which today is usually made either of fiberglass or carbon fiber) as an aid to leap over a bar. Pole jumping competitions were known to the ancient Greeks, as well as the Cretans and Celts. It has been a full medal event at the Olympic Games since 1896 for men and 2000 for women.
Contents |
Poles were used as a practical means of passing over natural obstacles in marshy places such as provinces of Friesland in The Netherlands, along the North Sea, and the great level of the Fens across Cambridgeshire, Huntingdonshire, Lincolnshire and Norfolk. Artificial draining of these marshes created a network of open drains or canals intersecting each other. To cross these without getting wet, while avoiding tedious roundabout journeys over bridges, a stack of jumping poles was kept at every house and used for vaulting over the canals. Venetian gondoliers have traditionally used punting poles for moving to the shore from their boat.
Distance pole vaulting competitions continue to be held annually in the lowlands around the North Sea. These far-jumping competitions (Frysk: Fierljeppen) are not based on height.
One of the earliest pole vaulting competitions where height was measured took place at the Ulverston Football and Cricket Club, Cumbria in 1843.[1] Modern competition began around 1850 in Germany, when pole vaulting was added to the exercises of the Turner gymnastic clubs by Johann C. F. GutsMuths and Frederich L. Jahn. The modern pole vaulting technique was developed in the United States at the end of the nineteenth century. In Great Britain, it was first practiced at the Caledonian Games.
Initially, vaulting poles were made from stiff materials such as bamboo or aluminum. The introduction of flexible vaulting poles made from composites such as fiberglass or carbon fiber allowed vaulters to achieve greater height. Physical attributes such as speed and agility are essential to pole vaulting effectively, but technical skill is an equally if not more important element. The object of pole vaulting is to clear a bar or crossbar supported upon two uprights (standards) without knocking it down.
Today, athletes compete in the pole vault as one of the four jumping events in track and field. Because the high jump and pole vault are both vertical jumps, the competitions are conducted similarly. Each athlete can choose what height they would like to enter the competition. Once they enter, they have three attempts to clear the height. If a height is cleared, the vaulter advances to the next height, where they will have three more attempts. Once the vaulter has three consecutive misses, they are out of the competition and the highest height they cleared is their result. A "no height", often denoted "NH", refers to the failure of a vaulter to clear any bar during the competition.
Once the vaulter enters the competition, they can choose to pass heights. If a vaulter achieves a miss on their first attempt at a height, they can pass to the next height, but they will only have two attempts at that height, as they will be out once they achieve three consecutive misses. Similarly, after earning two misses at a height, they could pass to the next height where they would have only one attempt.
The competitor who clears the highest height is the winner. If two or more vaulters have finished with the same height, the tie is broken by the number of misses at the final height. If the tied vaulters have the same number of misses at the last height cleared, the tie is broken by the total number of misses in the competition.
If there is still a tie for first place, a jump-off occurs to break the tie. Marks achieved in this type of jump-off are considered valid and count for any purpose that a mark achieved in a normal competition would.
If a tie in the other places still exists, a jump-off is not normally conducted, unless the competition is a qualifying meet, and the tie exists in the final qualifying spot. In this case, an administrative jump-off is conducted to break the tie, but the marks are not considered valid for any other purpose than breaking the tie.
A jump-off is a sudden death competition in which the tied vaulters attempt the same height, starting with the last attempted height. If both vaulters miss, the bar goes down by a small increment, and if both clear, the bar goes up by a small increment. A jump-off ends when one vaulter clears and the other misses. Each vaulter gets one attempt at each height until one makes and one misses.
The equipment and rules for pole vaulting are similar to the high jump. Unlike high jump, however, the athlete in the vault has the ability to select the horizontal position of the bar before each jump and can place it a distance beyond the back of the box, the metal pit that the pole is placed into immediately before takeoff. The range of distance the vaulter may place the standards varies depending on the level of competition.
If the pole used by the athlete dislodges the bar from the uprights, a foul attempt is ruled, even if the athlete themselves has cleared the height. An athlete does not benefit from quickly leaving the landing pad before the bar has fallen. The exception to this rule if the vaulter is vaulting outdoors and has made a clear effort to throw the pole back, but the wind has blown the pole into the bar; this counts as a clearance. This call is made at the discretion of the pole vault official. If the pole breaks during the execution of a vault, it is considered an equipment failure and is ruled a non-jump, neither a make nor a miss. Other types of equipment failure include the standards slipping down or the wind dislodging the bar when no contact was made by the vaulter.
Each athlete has a set amount of time in which to make an attempt. The amount of time varies by level of competition and the number of vaulters remaining. If the vaulter fails to begin an attempt within this time, the vaulter is charged with a time foul and the attempt is a miss.
Poles are manufactured with ratings corresponding to the vaulter's maximum weight. Some organizations forbid vaulters to use poles rated below their weight as a safety precaution. The recommended weight corresponds to a flex rating that is determined by the manufacturer by placing a standardized amount of stress (most commonly a 50 lb weight) on the pole and measuring how much the center of the pole is displaced. Therefore, two poles rated at the same weight are not necessarily the same stiffness.
Because pole stiffness and length are important factors to a vaulter's performance, it is not uncommon for an elite vaulter to carry as many as 10 poles to a competition. The effective properties of a pole can be changed by gripping the pole higher or lower in relation to the top of the pole. The left and right handgrips are typically a bit more than shoulder width apart. Poles are manufactured for people of all skill levels and body sizes, with sizes as short as 3.05m (10 feet) to as long as 5.30 m (17 feet 4.5 inches), with a wide range of weight ratings. Each manufacturer determines the weight rating for the pole and the location of the maximum handhold band.
Competitive pole vaulting began using solid ash poles. As the heights attained increased, the bamboo poles gave way to tubular aluminum, which was tapered at each end. Today's pole vaulters benefit from poles produced by wrapping pre-cut sheets of fiberglass that contains resin around a metal pole mandrel, to produce a slightly pre-bent pole that bends more easily under the compression caused by an athlete's take-off. The shape of the fiberglass sheets and the amount of fiberglass used is carefully planned to provide the desired length and stiffness of pole. Different fiber types, including carbon-fiber, are used to give poles specific characteristics intended to promote higher jumps. In recent years, carbon fiber has been added to the commonly used E-glass and S-glass materials to create a pole with a lighter carry weight.
As in the high jump, the landing area was originally a heap of sawdust or sand where athletes landed on their feet. As technology enabled higher vaults, mats evolved into bags of large chunks of foam. Today's high-tech mats are foam usually 1–1.5 meters (3 ft 3 in–4 ft 10 in) thick. Mats are growing larger in area as well to minimize risk of injury. Proper landing technique is on the back or shoulders. Landing on the feet should be avoided, to eliminate the risk of injury to the lower extremities, particularly ankle sprains.
Rule changes over the years have resulted in larger landing areas and additional padding of all hard and unyielding surfaces.
The pole vault crossbar has evolved from a triangular aluminum bar to a round fiberglass bar with rubber ends. This is balanced on standards and can be knocked off when it is hit by a pole vaulter or the pole. Rule changes have led to shorter pegs and crossbar ends that are semi-circular.
Phases of Pole Vaulting
|
Although there are many techniques used by vaulters at various skill levels to clear the bar, the generally accepted technical model can be broken down into several phases, listed and described below:
During the approach the pole vaulter sprints down the runway in such a way as to achieve maximum speed and correct position to initiate take-off at the end of the approach. Top class vaulters use approaches with 18 to 22 strides. At the beginning of the approach the pole is usually carried upright to some degree, and gradually lowered as the vaulter gets closer to the landing pit. This way the vaulter can minimize levered weight of the pole. The faster the vaulter can run and the more efficient his/her take-off is, the greater the potential energy that can be achieved and used during the vault. It is common for vaulters to gradually increase running speed throughout the approach, reaching maximum speed at take-off. Vaulters increase stride frequency while keeping the knees up like a sprinter. Unlike short sprint events such as the 100 m in which a forward lean is used to accelerate, vaulters maintain a more upright torso position throughout the approach to counter balance the effect of carrying the pole.
The plant and take off is initiated typically three steps out from the final step. Vaulters (usually) will count their steps backwards from their starting point to the box only counting the steps taken on the left foot (vice-versa for left-handers) except for the second step from the box, which is taken by the right foot. For example; a vaulter on a "ten count" (referring to the number of counted steps from the starting point to the box) would count backwards from ten, only counting the steps taken with the left foot, until the last three steps taken and both feet are counted as three, two, one. These last three steps are normally quicker than the previous strides and are referred to as the "turn-over". The goal of this phase is to efficiently translate the kinetic energy accumulated from the approach into potential energy stored by the elasticity of the pole, and to gain as much initial vertical height as possible by jumping off the ground. The plant starts with the vaulter raising his arms up from around the hips or mid-torso until they are fully outstretched above his head, with the right arm extended directly above the head and the left arm extended perpendicular to the pole (vice-versa for left-handed vaulters). At the same time, the vaulter is dropping the pole tip into the box. On the final step, the vaulter jumps off the trail leg which should always remain straight and then drives the front knee forward. As the pole slides into the back of the box the pole begins to bend and the vaulter continues up and forward, leaving the trail leg angled down and behind him.
The swing and row simply consists of the vaulter swinging his trail leg forward and rowing the pole, bringing his top arm down to the hips, while trying to keep the trail leg straight to store more potential energy into the pole, the rowing motion also keeps the pole bent for a longer period of time for the vaulter to get into optimum position. Once in a "U" shape the left arm hugs the pole tight to efficiently use the recoil within the pole. The goal is to carry out these motions as thoroughly and as quickly as possible; it is a race against the unbending of the pole. Effectively, this causes a double pendulum motion, with the top of the pole moving forward and pivoting from the box, while the vaulter acts as a second pendulum pivoting from the right hand. This action gives the vaulter the best position possible to be "ejected" off the pole. The swing continues until the hips are above the head and the arms are pulling the pole close to the chest; from there the vaulter shoots his legs up over the cross bar while keeping the pole close.
Another form of swing is called the double leg drop. After executing a normal take-off, the vaulter lets his lead leg drop and swings with both legs together. In doing this, the weight of the vaulter's lower body is centered further from his rotational axis, making it more difficult for the vaulter to swing with as great a speed as with a single legged swing. For the same reason, a vaulter with constant rotational speed will load the pole with more energy using a double legged swing than a single legged swing. Because the slower swing can make it more difficult for a vaulter to get in position for the rockback, the double leg drop is typically not taught as the conventional method. A successful double leg drop is exemplified by French vaulter Jean Galfione.
A third form of swing is called the tuck and shoot. This is accomplished by tucking both legs in toward the chest rather than leaving the trail leg extended. This has the opposite effect of the double leg drop: it shortens the lower body about the rotational axis, making the swing faster, but lessening the pole-loading effect of the swing. Because a shorter rotational axis can make it more difficult to use larger poles than with a longer axis, the tuck and shoot is also not considered the conventional method. A successful tuck and shoot is exemplified by former American record-holder Jeff Hartwig.
The extension refers to the extension of the hips upward with outstretched legs as the shoulders drive down, causing the vaulter to be positioned upside down. This position is often referred to as "inversion". While this phase is executed, the pole begins to recoil, propelling the vaulter quickly upward. The hands of the vaulter remain close to his body as they move from the shins back to the region around the hips and upper torso.
The turn is executed immediately after or even during the end of the rockback. As the name implies, the vaulter turns 180° toward the pole while extending the arms down past the head and shoulders. Typically the vaulter will begin to angle his body toward the bar as the turn is executed, although ideally the vaulter will remain as vertical as possible. A more accurate description of this phase of the vault may be "the spin" because the vaulter spins around an imaginary axis from head to toe.
This is often highly emphasized by spectators and novice vaulters, but it is arguably the easiest phase of the vault and is a result of proper execution of previous phases. This phase mainly consists of the vaulter pushing off the pole and releasing it so it falls away from the bar and mats. As his/her body goes over and around the bar, the vaulter is facing the bar. Rotation of the body over the bar occurs naturally, and the vaulter's main concern is making sure that his/her arms, face and any other appendages do not knock the bar off as he/she goes over. The vaulter should land near the middle of the foam landing mats, or pits, face up.
The following are terms commonly used in pole vault:
The so-called "six metres club", which consists of pole vaulters who have reached at least 6 metres (19 ft 8¼ in[2]) , is very prestigious. In 1985 Sergey Bubka became the first pole vaulter to clear 6 metres; he also holds the current[update] outdoor world record at 6.14 metres, set on 31 July 1994 in Sestriere.
All "6 metres club" members are men. The only woman to exceed 5 metres is Russian women's world-record holder Yelena Isinbayeva, who reached that height in 2005 and who has in total broken the women's world-record (indoor and outdoor), 27 times, culminating in her current world record of 5.06 metres obtained in 2009 at Letzigrund in Zurich.
Name of athlete | Nation | Outdoors | Indoors | Year first cleared 6 metres |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sergey Bubka | Soviet Union / Ukraine | 6.14 m (20 ft 1 3⁄4 in) | 6.15 m (20 ft 2 1⁄8 in) | 1985 |
Rodion Gataullin | Soviet Union / Russia | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 6.02 m (19 ft 9 in) | 1989 |
Okkert Brits | South Africa | 6.03 m (19 ft 9 3⁄8 in) [3] | 1995 | |
Igor Trandenkov | Russia | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | 1996 | |
Tim Lobinger | Germany | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 1997 | |
Maksim Tarasov | Russia | 6.05 m (19 ft 10 3⁄16 in) | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 1997 |
Dmitri Markov | Australia | 6.05 m (19 ft 10 3⁄16 in) [4] | 1998 | |
Jeff Hartwig | United States | 6.03 m (19 ft 9 3⁄8 in) | 6.02 m (19 ft 9 in) | 1998 |
Jean Galfione | France | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 1999 | |
Danny Ecker | Germany | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 2001 | |
Timothy Mack | United States | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | 2004 | |
Toby Stevenson | United States | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 2004 | |
Paul Burgess | Australia | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 2005 | |
Brad Walker | United States | 6.04 m (19 ft 9 13⁄16 in) [5] | 2006 | |
Steven Hooker | Australia | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | 6.06 m (19 ft 10 9⁄16 in) | 2008 |
Yevgeniy Lukyanenko | Russia | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | 2008 | |
Renaud Lavillenie | France | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | 6.03 m (19 ft 9 3⁄8 in) | 2009 |
Year | Height | Athlete | Place |
---|---|---|---|
1971 | 5.43 m (17 ft 9 3⁄4 in) | Kjell Isaksson (SWE) | Siena |
1972 | 5.63 m (18 ft 5 5⁄8 in) | Bob Seagren (USA) | Eugene |
1973 | 5.49 m (18 ft 1⁄8 in) | Steve Smith (USA) | New York |
1974 | 5.53 m (18 ft 1 11⁄16 in) | Steve Smith (USA) | Pocatello |
1975 | 5.65 m (18 ft 6 7⁄16 in) | David Roberts (USA) | Gainesville |
1976 | 5.70 m (18 ft 8 7⁄16 in) | David Roberts (USA) | Eugene |
1977 | 5.66 m (18 ft 6 13⁄16 in) | Wladyslaw Kozakiewicz (POL) | Warsaw |
1978 | 5.71 m (18 ft 8 13⁄16 in) | Mike Tully (USA) | Corvallis |
1979 | 5.65 m (18 ft 6 7⁄16 in) | Patrick Abada (FRA) Philippe Houvion (FRA) |
Paris Paris |
1980 | 5.78 m (18 ft 11 9⁄16 in) | Wladyslaw Kozakiewicz (POL) | Moscow |
1981 | 5.81 m (19 ft 3⁄4 in) | Vladimir Polyakov (URS) | Tbilisi |
1982 | 5.75 m (18 ft 10 3⁄8 in) | Dave Volz (USA) Jean-Michel Bellot (FRA) |
Nice Colombes |
1983 | 5.83 m (19 ft 1 1⁄2 in) | Thierry Vigneron (FRA) | Rome |
1984 | 5.94 m (19 ft 5 7⁄8 in) | Sergey Bubka (URS) | Rome |
1985 | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | Sergey Bubka (URS) | Paris |
1986 | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | Sergey Bubka (URS) | Moscow |
1987 | 6.03 m (19 ft 9 3⁄8 in) | Sergey Bubka (URS) | Prague |
1988 | 6.06 m (19 ft 10 9⁄16 in) | Sergey Bubka (URS) | Nice |
1989 | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | Sergey Bubka (URS) Rodion Gataullin (URS) |
Donetsk Tokyo |
1990 | 5.92 m (19 ft 5 1⁄16 in) | Rodion Gataullin (URS) | Seattle |
1991 | 6.10 m (20 ft 3⁄16 in) | Sergey Bubka (URS) | Malmö |
1992 | 6.13 m (20 ft 1 5⁄16 in) | Sergey Bubka (UKR) | Tokyo |
1993 | 6.05 m (19 ft 10 3⁄16 in) | Sergey Bubka (UKR) | London |
1994 | 6.14 m (20 ft 1 3⁄4 in) | Sergey Bubka (UKR) | Sestriere |
1995 | 6.03 m (19 ft 9 3⁄8 in) | Okkert Brits (RSA) | Cologne |
1996 | 6.02 m (19 ft 9 in) | Sergey Bubka (UKR) | Atlanta |
1997 | 6.05 m (19 ft 10 3⁄16 in) | Sergey Bubka (UKR) | Fukuoka |
1998 | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | Jeff Hartwig (USA) | Uniondale |
1999 | 6.05 m (19 ft 10 3⁄16 in) | Maxim Tarasov (RUS) | Athens |
2000 | 6.03 m (19 ft 9 3⁄8 in) | Jeff Hartwig (USA) | Jonesboro |
2001 | 6.05 m (19 ft 10 3⁄16 in) | Dmitriy Markov (AUS) | Edmonton |
2002 | 5.90 m (19 ft 4 5⁄16 in) | Jeff Hartwig (USA) Tim Lobinger (GER) |
Athens |
2003 | 5.95 m (19 ft 6 1⁄4 in) | Romain Mesnil (FRA) | Castres |
2004 | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | Timothy Mack (USA) | Monaco |
2005 | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | Paul Burgess (AUS) | Perth |
2006 | 6.00 m (19 ft 8 1⁄4 in) | Brad Walker (USA) | Jockgrim |
2007 | 5.95 m (19 ft 6 1⁄4 in) | Brad Walker (USA) | Brisbane |
2008 | 6.04 m (19 ft 9 13⁄16 in) | Brad Walker (USA) | Eugene |
2009 | 6.01 m (19 ft 8 5⁄8 in) | Renaud Lavillenie (FRA) | Leiria |
2010 | 5.95 m (19 ft 6 1⁄4 in) | Steven Hooker (AUS) | Split |
2011 | 5.90 m (19 ft 4 5⁄16 in) | Paweł Wojciechowski (POL) | Daegu |
Year | Height | Athlete | Place |
---|---|---|---|
1991 | 4.05 m (13 ft 3 7⁄16 in) | Zhang Chunzhen (CHN) | Guangzhou |
1992 | 4.05 m (13 ft 3 7⁄16 in) | Sun Caiyun (CHN) | Nanjing |
1993 | 4.11 m (13 ft 5 13⁄16 in) | Sun Caiyun (CHN) | Guangzhou |
1994 | 4.12 m (13 ft 6 3⁄16 in) | Sun Caiyun (CHN) | Guangzhou |
1995 | 4.28 m (14 ft 1⁄2 in) | Emma George (AUS) | Perth |
1996 | 4.45 m (14 ft 7 3⁄16 in) | Emma George (AUS) | Sapporo |
1997 | 4.55 m (14 ft 11 1⁄8 in) | Emma George (AUS) | Melbourne |
1998 | 4.59 m (15 ft 11⁄16 in) | Emma George (AUS) | Brisbane |
1999 | 4.60 m (15 ft 1 1⁄8 in) | Emma George (AUS) Stacy Dragila (USA) |
Sydney Seville |
2000 | 4.63 m (15 ft 2 5⁄16 in) | Stacy Dragila (USA) | Sacramento |
2001 | 4.81 m (15 ft 9 3⁄8 in) | Stacy Dragila (USA) | Palo Alto |
2002 | 4.78 m (15 ft 8 3⁄16 in) | Svetlana Feofanova (RUS) | Stockholm |
2003 | 4.82 m (15 ft 9 3⁄4 in) | Yelena Isinbayeva (RUS) | Gateshead |
2004 | 4.92 m (16 ft 1 11⁄16 in) | Yelena Isinbayeva (RUS) | Brussels |
2005 | 5.01 m (16 ft 5 1⁄4 in) | Yelena Isinbayeva (RUS) | Helsinki |
2006 | 4.91 m (16 ft 1 5⁄16 in) | Yelena Isinbayeva (RUS) | London |
2007 | 4.91 m (16 ft 1 5⁄16 in) | Yelena Isinbayeva (RUS) | Saint-Denis |
2008 | 5.05 m (16 ft 6 13⁄16 in) | Yelena Isinbayeva (RUS) | Beijing |
2009 | 5.06 m (16 ft 7 3⁄16 in) | Yelena Isinbayeva (RUS) | Zürich |
2010 | 4.89 m (16 ft 1⁄2 in) | Jennifer Suhr (USA) | Des Moines |
|